Book One — New Studies on Marcion (1923)

    Substantive Rendering Decisions

    4 min read

    0:005:55

    🎧 Listen while you read

    The notes below record the places where the English could have gone another way, and says which way it went and why. Some turn on a printed word that is misprinted or wrongly transmitted; some on a Greek form that decides whether a clause is active or passive; some on where a quotation ends and Harnack resumes in his own voice. They are given in the order of the pages of the German original, so that a reader working with the 1923 printing can check any one of them against the page in front of him. Ordinary punctuation and copy-editing are not listed.

    1. p. 3, “M. E.” — attributed to von Soden, inside his quotation, rather than to Harnack. The quotation is therefore not closed until after “more reactionary than radical”.
    2. p. 3, τῶν πεπιστευκέναι νομιζομένων — rendered as a passive, “those who are reputed to have believed”; the participle is middle-passive and cannot carry an active sense here.
    3. p. 3, Origen’s remark — the printed Greek is τοιοῦτον δέ ἐστι τὸ πλῆθος, not τοιοῦτον ἦν; corrected against the page and the English adjusted to the present tense.
    4. p. 3, Zephyrinus’s formula — “publicly promulgated as binding” (zur Nachachtung), replacing any sense of contempt.
    5. p. 3, typology — Marcion assigned to the modalistic pole and the Gnostics to the aeon-dissolution pole, with the ecclesiastical hypostasis-Christology mediating.
    6. pp. 4–7, speaker frame — the numbered objections 3–4, the Grejdanus paragraph and the whole Bauer summary are marked as reported criticism; Harnack’s resumption is placed exactly at “Thus far Bauer” (p. 7).
    7. p. 6, “righteous” — Harnack’s quotation marks around ‚gerechten’ retained everywhere in Bauer’s ironic reading, so that the English does not present Bauer’s irony as a description.
    8. p. 7, “keinen Auftrieb … erheben” — translated according to the evident intention (“no lift that raises him above the level of the bad”), with the anacoluthon flagged as a printer’s error rather than smoothed over silently.
    9. p. 8, Adamantius references — verified as II, 9; II, 1 f.; II, 19 f.; I, 3; II, 6.
    10. p. 8, “mit ihm Fremden als Sündern” — “on those who were foreign to him, as sinners”, not “on the strangers as sinners”; the emphasis is on their being alien to the good God.
    11. p. 12, “Gut > Gerecht” — printed with the mathematical sign, not a dash; the greater-than is Harnack’s own shorthand for the ranking of the two predicates.
    12. p. 13, note 3 — the self-reference is to “my compilation of the Antitheses, p. 95”, not p. 85.
    13. p. 13, πονηρός — the whole gradation (“from oppressor to tormentor …”) kept as a list of burdens imposed on men, not of moral badness, since Harnack’s point is precisely that “bad” does not belong among these properties.
    14. p. 19, note 1 — the Clement citation reads φύσις κακή, not γένεσις κακή.
    15. p. 21, note 2 (continued) — Justin’s phrase is οἱ ἀπὸ τούτων ὁρμώμενοι, “those who take their start from these”.
    16. p. 24, the creed — the printed text is Πιστεύω εἰς θεὸν πατέρα παντοκράτορα, without ἕνα; the creed is quoted short, and the missing word matters to his argument, so nothing has been supplied.
    17. p. 25, 1 John 5:19 — printed with the article, Ὁ κόσμος ὅλος ἐν τῷ πονηρῷ κεῖται, and so retained; rendered “the whole world lies in the power of the evil one”.
    18. p. 25, πονηρότατος — the gloss “the most sorely tried” (Harnack’s „geplagtesten”) kept, and the God of the world called “a harassed God”, preserving Harnack’s point that πονηρός is not “evil”.
    19. p. 27, note 5 — the siglum is ℵ (Sinaiticus).
    20. p. 28 — “put an end to the preferential treatment of B ℵ Origen”; the OCR-derived “Bn Origenes” misread the siglum ℵ as the letter n.
    21. p. 29, first entry — “Index, p. XII, line 10”, not p. XI.
    22. p. 29, Justin’s address — printed nominative μισούμενοι καὶ ἐπηρεαζόμενοι retained rather than corrected to the genitive of the standard text.
    23. p. 30, “S. 7* Anmerk. 2 Z. 5 v. u.” — the word to be read is ἄθεοι; an earlier reading “Stow” was an OCR artefact.
    24. p. 30, Jodl reference — Gesch. d. Ethik² II, 1912, pp. 474 f., 713 f. (not 718 f.).
    25. p. 31, “Schlußkammer” — translated “closing bracket” (Schlußklammer), with the misprint noted.
    26. p. 32, Luke 4:16 — the reconstruction printed as Ναζαρὲδ with ⟨εἰσῆλθεν⟩ supplied in angle brackets, as in the original.
    27. p. 32, p. 229* list — the first passage is Luke 5:39 (matching item 1 on p. 33), not 6:39.
    28. p. 34, Arnobius — “the highest God creates only quod omnibus sit salutare”; the OCR “not quod” was a misreading of nur.
    29. p. 34, Ephrem — “The discourse called ‘of Domnus’”, transcribed by C. W. Mitchell, A. A. Bevan and F. C. Burkitt.
    30. pp. 34–35, Zacharias Rhetor — Harnack’s corrected rendering is present tense: “They do not hold themselves separate from us, as the Marcionites do” (halten, not hatten).
    31. p. 35, Photius — the second occurrence of the group name is printed Μαρκιανιστῶν, differing from Μαρκιωνιστῶν earlier in the same sentence; both retained as printed.
    32. Throughout — kirchlich never rendered “mainstream”; katholisch always “Catholic” in the historical sense; Harnack’s alternation of “M.” and “Marcion” preserved rather than normalized.

    The whole translation was afterwards read a second time against the printed German page images, and twenty further readings were corrected in that pass; they are carried in the text above. Where the 1923 printing is itself defective — an anacoluthon, a misprinted siglum, a wrong cross-reference — the note says so rather than smoothing the German silently.